Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Werdegang

Stephan Scheel ist Professor für Politische Soziologie an der Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. Seine Forschungsinteressen liegen an der Schnittstelle der Grenz- und Migrationsforschung, Staatsbürgerschaftsforschung, kritischer Sicherheitsforschung sowie der Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Er ist Experte im Gebiet der biometrischen Grenzkontrollen.

Akademischer Werdegang 

  • seit 2022: Professor für Politische Soziologie an der Leuphana
  • 2019-2022: Juniorprofessor am Institut für Soziologie der Universität Duisburg-Essen (Transnationale Kooperations- und Migrationsforschung)
  • 2017-2018: PostDoc im Forschungsprojekt „Processing Citizenship“ an der Universität Twente, Niederlande
  • 2014-2017: PostDoc im Forschungsprojekt „ARITHMUS – How Data Make a People“ am Goldsmith College, University of London
  • 2014: PhD in Political and International Studies an der Open University in Milton Keynes, Großbritannien
  • 2010: Magister Artium in Politischen Wissenschaften an der Universität Hamburg

Ausgewählte Auszeichnungen

Projekte

  1. EU COST Action on "Data Matters: Sociotechnical Challenges of European Migration and Border Control (DATAMIG)”
    Stephan Scheel (Wissenschaftliche Projektleiter*in)

    Projekt: Forschung

  2. Doing Digital Identities (ERC-Starting Grant)
    Stephan Scheel (Wissenschaftliche Projektleiter*in) , Salah El-Kahil (Projektmitarbeiter*in) , Oisin O'Brien (Projektmitarbeiter*in) , Laura Lambert (Projektmitarbeiter*in) , Sindhunata Hargyono (Projektmitarbeiter*in)

    Projekt: Forschung

Publikationen

Bücher und Anthologien

  1. Data practices: making up a European people
    Evelyn Ruppert (Herausgeber*in) , Stephan Scheel (Herausgeber*in) , 2021 London , 368 S.

    Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienBuchForschung

  2. Autonomy of migration?: Appropriating mobility within biometric border regimes
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , 2019 , 230 S.

    Publikation: Bücher und AnthologienMonografienForschungbegutachtet

Beiträge in Zeitschriften

  1. Regimes of Proof: On Contested Identities in Border and Migration Control
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Kelly Bescherer (Autor*in) , 01.11.2025 , in: International Migration, 63, 6 , 12 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

  2. Re-bordering life and labor during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean
    Soledad Álvarez Velasco (Autor*in) , Nicholas De Genova (Autor*in) , Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , 27.09.2025 , in: Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space , 17 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenAndere (Vorworte. Editoral u.ä.)Forschung

  3. Migrant struggles and moral economies of subversion: mimicry and opacity
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , 01.05.2025 , in: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51, 10 , S. 2648-2667 , 20 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

  4. The Deportation Gap as a Statistical Chimera: How Nonknowledge Informs Migration Policies
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , 01.04.2025 , in: Geopolitics, 30, 3 , S. 1028-1050 , 23 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

  5. Playing dirty: The shady governance and reproduction of migrant illegality
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , 01.01.2025 , in: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51, 2 , S. 464-482 , 19 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in ZeitschriftenZeitschriftenaufsätzeForschungbegutachtet

Beiträge in Sammelwerken

  1. Introduction: The Politics of Making Up a European People
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Evelyn Ruppert (Autor*in) , 02.11.2021 London , S. 1-28 , 28 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelForschung

  2. Data Practices
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Evelyn Ruppert (Autor*in) , 02.11.2021 London , S. 29-48 , 20 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelForschung

  3. Migrants: Omitting and Recalibrating
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Funda Ustek-Spilda (Autor*in) , 02.11.2021 London , S. 125-164 , 40 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelForschung

  4. Foreigners: Inferring and Assigning
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Francisca Grommé (Autor*in) , 02.11.2021 9781912685851 , S. 165-204 , 40 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelForschungbegutachtet

  5. Conclusion: The Politics of Data Practices
    Stephan Scheel (Autor*in) , Evelyn Ruppert (Autor*in) , 02.11.2021 London , S. 269-303 , 35 S.

    Publikation: Beiträge in SammelwerkenKapitelForschungbegutachtet

Auszeichnungen

  1. Elected Member of the Global Young Faculty VII (MERCUR foundation)
    Stephan Scheel (Empfänger/-in) ,

    Auszeichnung: Externe Preise, Stipendien, Auszeichnungen, ErnennungenTransfer

  2. Michael Nicholson Thesis Prize of the British International Studies Association (BISA)
    Stephan Scheel (Empfänger/-in) ,

    Auszeichnung: Externe Preise, Stipendien, Auszeichnungen, ErnennungenForschung

  3. PhD-scholarship
    Stephan Scheel (Empfänger/-in) ,

    Auszeichnung: Externe Preise, Stipendien, Auszeichnungen, ErnennungenLehre

Lehrveranstaltungen

Building on Leuphana Semester’s foregoing general introduction into research methods, this course offers further insights into methods that are crucial for studying digital media. The course starts from the observation that students and researchers alike often find it challenging to develop methods that allow to capture practices, content and aesthetics of “the digital” in contemporary media. One issue in the study of digital media is that the production and circulation of digital data is often “black boxed” and that we find it difficult to investigate what is happening “behind the screen”. For example, users themselves often do not know what data and metadata are being collected and stored by platforms and telecom providers, and to what effect, and what proprietary algorithms are facilitating processes of data production and analysis. Other important research topics concern the question how the design of digital devices and interfaces facilitates certain actions while foreclosing others, thus shaping user behavior and information flows. Hence, students and researchers of digital media always need to reflect on the following questions: What kind of information do I need to answer my research question? Which method(s) will allow me to gather this information? How will I have to adapt my method to the context under study in order to make it work? In how far are classical methods of social scientific research still useful for studying digital media? What are their limitations and constraints? In which research contexts are digital methods useful, valid or limited?

In each session of the seminar, we focus on one method. These include inter alia: object analysis; the use of AI-tools for studies and research; qualitative interviews; participant observations, visual methods and digital ethnography. Each method will be introduced and discussed based on short presentations and shared readings. Based on these readings and discussions, there will be micro-exercises allowing students to gain an understanding of a method via the experience of performing it.
Nächster Termin:
Mittwoch, 02.12.2026 um 09:45 Uhr
Raum: HMS
Building on Leuphana Semester’s foregoing general introduction into research methods, this course offers further insights into methods that are crucial for studying digital media. The course starts from the observation that students and researchers alike often find it challenging to develop methods that allow to capture practices, content and aesthetics of “the digital” in contemporary media. One issue in the study of digital media is that the production and circulation of digital data is often “black boxed” and that we find it difficult to investigate what is happening “behind the screen”. For example, users themselves often do not know what data and metadata are being collected and stored by platforms and telecom providers, and to what effect, and what proprietary algorithms are facilitating processes of data production and analysis. Other important research topics concern the question how the design of digital devices and interfaces facilitates certain actions while foreclosing others, thus shaping user behavior and information flows. Hence, students and researchers of digital media always need to reflect on the following questions: What kind of information do I need to answer my research question? Which method(s) will allow me to gather this information? How will I have to adapt my method to the context under study in order to make it work? In how far are classical methods of social scientific research still useful for studying digital media? What are their limitations and constraints? In which research contexts are digital methods useful, valid or limited?

In each session of the seminar, we will focus on one method. These include inter alia: object analysis; the use of AI-tools for studies and research; qualitative interviews; participant observation, visual methods and digital ethnography. Each method will be introduced and discussed based on short presentations and shared readings. Based on these readings and discussions, there will be micro-exercises allowing students to gain an understanding of a method via the experience of performing it.
Nächster Termin:
Mittwoch, 02.12.2026 um 14:00 Uhr
Raum: HMS
Performativity belongs to one of the most prominent concepts in cultural studies and the social sciences more generally. In a nutshell, performativity refers to the idea that discourses, speech acts and practices do not just account for and describe realities but also bring them into being. However, this popularity also leads to much confusion about the actual meaning of the concept, as the notion of performativity is used in various and at times conflicting ways. This course offers an introduction to the most influential understandings of performativity and related debates about the politics of the performative in different fields of study. It shows that different conceptions and genealogies of the idea of performativity co-exist. Performativity can be traced back to James Austin’s speech act theory as well as early debates within gender studies and science and technology studies. Conceptions of performativity differ in how they understand the ‘doing’ of social realities, whether as reiterative practices, speech acts and discourses or scripts for action inscribed in laws or technological objects. Based on close readings, participants of this course are encouraged to develop their own understanding of the notion of performativity. Throughout the course we will pay particular attention to one crucial implication of the notion of performativity: the need for reflexivity and responsibility in the context of knowledge production as the knowledge we produce about in relation to our matters of concern does not only describe realities ‘out there’ but also brings them into being in particular ways.
Nächster Termin:
Dienstag, 13.10.2026 um 10:15 Uhr